409A Pricing Information: What You Need to Share Upfront

Table of Contents

What information affects your 409A pricing before work begins, and why does it matter? Accurate upfront pricing depends on understanding your equity structure, financial maturity, and timing needs. When these details are clear early, you avoid scope changes and last-minute adjustments.

Below is a breakdown of the information typically required to price a 409A engagement correctly and how each item affects effort and risk.

Most recent cap table

Your cap table shows how ownership is structured across founders, employees, and investors.

It helps determine:

  • The number and types of equity instruments in play
  • How value needs to be allocated across share classes
  • Whether additional modeling is required

A clean, up-to-date cap table keeps pricing predictable.

Last preferred financing round details

Details from your most recent priced round provide critical valuation signals.

These include:

  • Close date of the round
  • Share price
  • Key economic and control terms

Recent rounds with complex terms require more analysis and review, which affects pricing. Clear documentation here reduces follow-up questions.

Company stage and headcount

High-level context helps set the baseline for the engagement.

Stage indicates:

  • Operating history
  • Investor expectations
  • Likely audit scrutiny

Headcount provides insight into:

  • Option grant volume
  • Equity administration needs

Together, these factors help estimate valuation scope.

SAFEs, convertibles, and complex equity terms

Alternative financing instruments add layers to the valuation.

Common examples:

  • SAFEs with valuation caps or discounts
  • Convertible notes with varying conversion mechanics
  • Custom investor rights

Each instrument introduces additional modeling and documentation, which directly impacts pricing.

Revenue and financial projections

Revenue status and forecast quality influence both risk and effort.

If your company:

  • Has recurring revenue
  • Maintains forward-looking projections
  • Uses forecasts in board reporting

The valuation team can align assumptions more efficiently. Limited or inconsistent forecasts often require extra analysis.

Target timeline for completion

Timing affects resource planning.

Standard timelines allow for a smooth review process. Compressed deadlines require priority handling and tighter coordination, which may affect pricing.

Why this information matters

Sharing this information upfront allows indinero to scope the engagement accurately, align resources, and set clear expectations. The result is fewer surprises, faster turnaround, and pricing that reflects your actual situation rather than estimates.

If you are preparing for a 409A valuation, gathering these details early is one of the simplest ways to keep the process on track.

Don’t Miss These Other Resources

R&D Offer Quiz

Step 1 of 3

Answer to find out if you're eligible for R&D tax credits.

Do the activities performed relate to a new or improved business component’s function, performance, reliability, quality, or composition?(Required)
For Example: A mid-sized packaging company develops a slightly modified cardboard box design to improve its stacking strength (reliability) for warehouse storage, involving minor adjustments to the corrugation pattern to reduce collapse under standard weight loads.
Is your company trying to discover information to eliminate uncertainty concerning the capability or method for developing or improving a business component?(Required)
For Example: A furniture manufacturer investigates whether a cheaper wood adhesive can hold joints as effectively as the current one during assembly, testing bond strength to resolve doubts about its capability in standard production lines.
Do the activities performed constitute a process of experimentation?(Required)
For Example: An auto parts supplier runs a series of bench tests on different lubricant formulations to find one that reduces friction in engine bearings more effectively, systematically comparing wear rates over simulated operating cycles.